Recently, Google released the Pixel 10a, which was pretty much a static copy of the 9a. MobileSyrup editor-in-chief Jon Lamont reviewed the 10a and noted that while it was still a good phone, the 10a was also basically a clone of the 9a — interested customers should try to pick up a discounted 9a first, if they can find one.
Apple’s iPhone 17e is coming out on March 11, 2026. While it also seems like a clone of its predecessor, the iPhone 16e, I won’t be ending this review by telling you to buy the 16e instead, as there are some meaningful differences that I’d consider worth getting the updated version over last year’s model, such as a more durable display, better processor, double the storage, and MagSafe. Also, this one comes in a very pretty Soft Pink.
Meant to last
Okay, so we’ve all seen iPhones, and when I think of the most basic version of an iPhone, I picture the 17e. Aside from still having the notch, the iPhone 17e offers a modern design for a mid-range phone. It’s not super thin, the bezels aren’t tiny, but it fits in your hand well, and won’t weigh down your pocket.
Typically, I like big phones, so I wouldn’t choose this device, because it measures 146.7 x 71.5 x 7.8mm with a 6.1-inch display; however, for those who prefer a more manageable-sized handset, the 17e is a good choice. I’ve had some friends with smaller hands hold the device, and they liked how it felt, and said it reminded them of their current devices, which were some older models like the iPhone 12.

It’s important to mention that Apple did some crazy drop tests on this phone to make sure it can withstand drops from a variety of angles onto asphalt. When I’m home, I go caseless with the 17e, and while I’m not performing drop tests, I’m a bit of a clumsy guy, but I have no worries about dropping the device. It’s even fallen a couple of times and is still going strong.
The iPhone 17e uses a durable Ceramic Shield 2, which makes it three times more scratch-resistant than even the iPhone 16 Pro Max. I still wouldn’t call the iPhone 17e the most durable of Apple’s handsets; that prize goes to the iPhone Air, but the 17e’s display can most definitely survive dings and drops.
Soft Pink

Let’s talk about the new Soft Pink colour. It’s a subtle pink, but I absolutely love it, and I really hope Apple brings this colour variant to its mainline of devices. The aluminum frame’s metallic pink looks so premium, despite the phone’s C$899 price tag. You even get the metallic pink around the single camera, which just looks so damn good. Seriously, it’s such a cool vibe.
Side note: I think Apple is getting pretty good at highlighting cool colour variants like this, or the Cosmic Orange 17 Pro 😍. Keep doing fun colours, Apple! As part of the reviewer’s package, Apple loaned me the $79 Soft Pink crossbody strap, which attaches to a silicone case. Wearing a pink iPhone around the streets of Toronto is baller. I feel like it adds a fun pink element to my outfits, and I’m a big fan.
Small yet powerful

The iPhone 17e comes with double the storage (256GB compared to the iPhone 16e’s 128GB storage base) at the same price. Last year, Brad Bennett called the iPhone 16e expensive, especially compared to the $300 cheaper iPhone SE. However, Bennett created a very detailed chart last year that detailed how much every iPhone costs in Canada adjusted for inflation, and the iPhone 16e put up a very good fight. And if the 16e put up a good fight, then the 17e, with double the storage and a better processor, is an OHKO.
The iPhone 17e features the same A19 chip as the iPhone 17, and it’s incredibly capable. I’m typically used to covering flagship-level devices, and the 17e can definitely compete against these phones; however, it’s worth noting that it can’t replace your 17 Pro Max. For instance, I was able to edit a reel for Instagram completely on the device, play Marvel Snap, and watch YouTube videos, all without any issues or lag. However, I also played titles like Oceanhorn 3 and Prince of Persia: The Lost Crown, and while it played well without any hitch, the device would get a lot warmer. After 20 minutes of Oceanhorn 3, the 17e’s aluminum frame was hot to the touch. This can be mitigated by using a controller attachment like the Backbone Pro, but still something to keep in mind for the gamers out there.

The iPhone 17e also features Messages via satellite, so you can send a message if you’re off the grid or use Emergency SOS via satellite if you need rescuing.
I haven’t had the iPhone 17e for too long, but I’ve realized that it has a surprisingly good battery life. I could definitely go more than a day without charging, with an average of 4.5 hours of screen time. Playing Oceanhorn 3 definitely killed some of the battery, so on my testing days, I would need to charge before going to bed, but still, I was quite impressed by the little device.
And MagSafe, the iPhone 17e offers 15W wireless charging. I love that I can just put it on my Belkin MagSafe wireless charger. And of course, if you have other MagSafe accessories, you can magnetically and securely attach things like your wallet. However, I’d prefer quicker wireless charging like the iPhone 17; 15W isn’t bad, but call me greedy.
Beautiful shots

The iPhone 17e only has a single 48-megapixel ‘Fusion’ camera, which Apple says can take 2x telephoto zoom in optical quality. I haven’t reviewed a phone with a single camera in years, so this was a fun trial for me. Similar to the battery, I was very impressed by the quality of the images, showing you don’t need a phone with a 200-megapixel camera to take some awesome photos.
Details are great, colours are beautiful, there’s a great sense of high dynamic range and depth. However, despite being impressed by the camera, I still wished that the phone offered a second ultrawide camera; I felt like it was missing during my testing. I tend to go back and forth on whether I’d want more zoom or ultrawide, but it felt like it was missing.
Lowlight camera performance was good and full of details. However, after using the iPhone 17 Pro Max for the last several months, I wish the 17e had the Center Stage 18-megapixel camera; it’s so good, whereas the 17e’s selfies could be a bit better. And strangely, I didn’t realize how much I’d miss the Camera Control button. It’s worth noting, though, if you’re coming from an older device, then you won’t know what you’re missing, and the 17e is still worth considering. Plus, you can somewhat replace Camera Control with the Action button if you want that quick access. Although I like to use mine on Shazam just in case there’s a banger.
Should you buy it?

On the Apple website, there’s a section that says “Worth the upgrade?” that includes comparisons to the iPhone 11, 12 and iPhone SE 3rd gen, but honestly, I think the company is underselling this device. If you’re upgrading from even an iPhone 13 or 14 and want to keep it under C$1,000, I’d grab the iPhone 17e.
Of course, the iPhone 17 is better, but it also costs $230 more. At $899 for a phone with 256GB of storage, a solid performance — if you’re not hardcore gaming — beautiful pictures and MagSafe, the iPhone 17e is great.
MobileSyrup may earn a commission from purchases made via our links, which helps fund the journalism we provide free on our website. These links do not influence our editorial content. Support us here.






















